DESIGN.md: one process with several threads (D16), three layers (D17), HA-centric object classes (D18), injected configuration (D19). Design decisions move from REQUIREMENTS.md to DESIGN.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.7 KiB
Progress
Where the project stands, and what happened in each session. Newest first. The process is in CLAUDE.md ("Working rules").
Current state
- Iteration 1, phase 2 (planning and design) started. Phase 1 is approved (D13); REQUIREMENTS.md is the baseline.
Next steps
Phase 2: first the high-level architecture, then the details for the MVP (D8). High-level questions, in this order:
Process model: one process, several threads (D16).Layers: presentation, business logic, I/O (D17).- How features plug in: object classes (D18) and configuration injection (D19) settled; open: how the classes are wired.
- HA channels: MQTT only, or prepare for a second one for the dashboard (Q2/Q3)?
- Overlay kinds: dashboard tabs and world overlays (platform extension).
- Runtime model: which work runs in which thread (D16: several threads).
- Test strategy at a high level.
Details afterwards (MQTT library done: D14, D15): topics and payloads, basic notification, configuration, packaging of libmosquitto.
Log
2026-10-05: requirements approved
- User approved REQUIREMENTS.md including the priorities (D13). Phase 2 started.
- Q4 decided: libmosquitto, shipped in the package (D14). Qt MQTT ruled out: private Qt API requires the exact Qt version. Checked on the Frame: no MQTT library installed; libssl/ libcrypto 3 and libcjson 1 present.
- HA discovery: own small layer on QJson, device-based discovery (D15); hacpp and the embedded libraries rejected.
- Checked on the Frame which Qt modules, plugins and audio/network tools exist; library list per requirement in REQUIREMENTS.md Appendix C. Notable: Qt WebEngine and Qt WebSockets are present (relevant for Q2/Q3).
- libmosquitto ABI check: Debian's 2.0.21 needs at most
OPENSSL_3.0.0/GLIBC_2.34; the Frame has OpenSSL 3.2.1 and glibc 2.39. No libcjson dependency. D14 holds. - Started docs/DESIGN.md: one process (D16), three layers (D17), HA-centric object classes (D18). HA side: FrameAssistant needs only stock HA; how the user wraps commands (scripts, pyscript) is up to them (NFR-6 unchanged).
- Agreed to settle the high-level architecture first (list under "Next steps"), before component details.
- Stay with the Debian build container: an Arch container wouldn't match SteamOS's own package versions (private repos, rolling Arch) and has no arm64 multiarch for cross builds.
2026-10-04/05: project set-up and requirements
-
Copied the vrdashboard template. Removed what the app doesn't need:
examples/(diagnostics app) and theVRDASH_BUILD_EXAMPLESoption- the Frame test package (
scripts/package-frame-test.sh,docs/FRAME-TESTING.md, screenshots) - the demo UI (
src/qml/DemoPage.qml)
Main.qmlshows a placeholder card. -
Named the app FrameAssistant, "Steam Frame companion for Home Assistant":
- CMake project
frameassistant, executableframe-assistant - app key
net.matzman.frameassistant, tab "Frame Assistant", QML moduleFrameAssistant
Names rejected:
- "Steam…" and "…Home Assistant": trademarks
- "HASS…": the user dislikes it, because "Hass" is German for hate.
- CMake project
-
Agreed working rules (in CLAUDE.md):
- explicit permission for everything; ask instead of assuming
- iterative five-phase cycle; an informal "ok" approves a phase
- document everything in Markdown in
docs/
-
git init. Baseline commit4a5b090. -
Requirements engineering (several question rounds with the user). The results are in REQUIREMENTS.md:
- decisions D1–D12
- 51 requirements
- research on OpenVR data sources (Appendix A)
-
Checks:
native-debugbuilds,ctestpasses 6/6 (Vulkan surface test skipped, no Vulkan on this host),--snapshotrenders.